|
Post by trubble on Jun 5, 2012 6:50:46 GMT
I'll have to listen! (I like ''Where is the Love?")
|
|
|
Post by trubble on Jun 5, 2012 6:59:38 GMT
Oh dear, must be something in the stars this week. Lonewolf...hope you come back. I am sure it can all be resolved.
|
|
|
Post by jean on Jun 5, 2012 8:15:05 GMT
I wish!!! I was hoping it was Jean. ;D It could have been my little sister, who used to sneak out from school to go to the Cavern at lunch time. But when I was at school, so were they - in Paul McCartney's case, just over the road from me, and by the time they were famous, I'd left home. Anyway I would never have behaved like that. But I knew plently of people from the same social milieu and I know how we all spoke. They say Lennon's formidable Aunt Mimi was a bit of a snob, but I bet even she coldn't have ensured that he spoke differently from everyone around him.
|
|
|
Post by sadie1263 on Jun 5, 2012 16:24:25 GMT
when Lennon placed a menstruation "towel" on his forehead and scuffled with a waitress Well, who hasn't done that?! Fuss about nothing. My bigger question.....is why was one laying around.....and how the heck did he keep it on his forehead......no wait.....no one answer that!!!!
|
|
|
Post by trubble on Jun 5, 2012 16:36:48 GMT
;D
|
|
|
Post by Hunny on Jun 5, 2012 18:28:45 GMT
Uri Geller was a skilled professional stage magician. He later began to declare that he had paranormal powers and in particular the power to bend metal by the power of his mind. A number of investigations into his alleged skills were conducted by scientists and other professional stage magicians showed how his tricks could easily be duplicated. I have an open mind on most subjects (closed minds do nobody any favours least of all anyone who is sincerely interested in researching the truth) but to me Geller was simply an entertainer and what he did can be and has been done by stage magicians. The limited investigation of his claims by genuine scientists also failed to provide any support for the notion that he actually possessed the power to bend metal or otherwise influence objects using the power of his mind. If we regard Geller as an entertainer whose sales pitch was a pretence to be able to perform using paranormal powers I think that is probably a more accurate assessment of him than the simplistic assertion that he was either a fraud or a master of supernatural powers. It's true Deyana. Geller was a performer. However, don't give up the idea of mind over matter. What you think IS what becomes. There are scads of books you could read that explain that. I'd suggest Wayne Dyer 1 - The Power Of Intention and 2 - Manifest Your Destiny . These are books that teach that what you think of happens. That it is a power you have to use. I love listening to Dyer speak on PBS at Pledge Drive, he's inspiring because he does not offer a God to have to ask, he offers you your own power to create, simply by knowing what you need. It may sound a little like magic, but I'm a card-carrying atheist because i wont "believe in" things unless they're provable, yet I'm saying this functional spirituality he offers is reality. It's how we work. And it's all about developing your intuition. (He does back this up with science.) Dyer says think of it and it becomes, well, I tested that. I thought of some money, it came. So I thought of a bigger amount, it came. A couple times I could swear I kept a green light from changing just by needing it to with my mind. I've also gotten to where I can find where things are just by emptying my mind, and letting the hunch come where it is. And if there is danger just around a corner, I find I can sense that. Oh and if you need to get in touch with someone, think of them a lot; they'll sense it and call you! And here's an experiment you can do today: Sit in a crowd of people, pick someone at random and stare at the back of their head relentlessly. They'll get fidgety, then turn and look right at you. But how did they know?? Well, can you explain that without using the word "psychic"? And again, I'm a prove-it-to-me atheist, so I'm saying it isn't just kooky belief. There IS some "magic" to living. We DO have some power (remember i talked about intuition?) (it's about that, and also that we are connected to each other intuitively as well. You can create what Carl Jung called a "synchronicity" (google that! There's your backing science). So..I don't know if people can make objects move, but we can do a lot with intuition...so read! Develop your intuitive power! And enjoy ____________________________________________ @ Mike: I am sorry I came across the way I did to you yesterday. I had a talk with a couple people and well, it seems I took your opinion as a personal attack, and I shouldn't have. Thank you for that nice birthday wish you posted. That was a classy move, and it made my day nicer. I hope yours goes well too. ..Please always feel free to disagree with me. I don't really want to make you feel you shouldn't. (like what I wrote to Deyana here..most people think I'm full of it when i talk like this, and if you see it as nonsense too, fire away! I promise not to dent
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Jun 5, 2012 20:28:42 GMT
Uri Geller was a skilled professional stage magician. He later began to declare that he had paranormal powers and in particular the power to bend metal by the power of his mind. A number of investigations into his alleged skills were conducted by scientists and other professional stage magicians showed how his tricks could easily be duplicated. I have an open mind on most subjects (closed minds do nobody any favours least of all anyone who is sincerely interested in researching the truth) but to me Geller was simply an entertainer and what he did can be and has been done by stage magicians. The limited investigation of his claims by genuine scientists also failed to provide any support for the notion that he actually possessed the power to bend metal or otherwise influence objects using the power of his mind. If we regard Geller as an entertainer whose sales pitch was a pretence to be able to perform using paranormal powers I think that is probably a more accurate assessment of him than the simplistic assertion that he was either a fraud or a master of supernatural powers. It's true Deyana. Geller was a performer. However, don't give up the idea of mind over matter. What you think IS what becomes. There are scads of books you could read that explain that. I'd suggest Wayne Dyer 1 - The Power Of Intention and 2 - Manifest Your Destiny . These are books that teach that what you think of happens. That it is a power you have to use. I love listening to Dyer speak on PBS at Pledge Drive, he's inspiring because he does not offer a God to have to ask, he offers you your own power to create, simply by knowing what you need. It may sound a little like magic, but I'm a card-carrying atheist because i wont "believe in" things unless they're provable, yet I'm saying this functional spirituality he offers is reality. It's how we work. And it's all about developing your intuition. (He does back this up with science.) Dyer says think of it and it becomes, well, I tested that. I thought of some money, it came. So I thought of a bigger amount, it came. A couple times I could swear I kept a green light from changing just by needing it to with my mind. I've also gotten to where I can find where things are just by emptying my mind, and letting the hunch come where it is. And if there is danger just around a corner, I find I can sense that. Oh and if you need to get in touch with someone, think of them a lot; they'll sense it and call you! And here's an experiment you can do today: Sit in a crowd of people, pick someone at random and stare at the back of their head relentlessly. They'll get fidgety, then turn and look right at you. But how did they know?? Well, can you explain that without using the word "psychic"? And again, I'm a prove-it-to-me atheist, so I'm saying it isn't just kooky belief. There IS some "magic" to living. We DO have some power (remember i talked about intuition?) (it's about that, and also that we are connected to each other intuitively as well. You can create what Carl Jung called a "synchronicity" (google that! There's your backing science). So..I don't know if people can make objects move, but we can do a lot with intuition...so read! Develop your intuitive power! And enjoy ____________________________________________ @ Mike: I am sorry I came across the way I did to you yesterday. I had a talk with a couple people and well, it seems I took your opinion as a personal attack, and I shouldn't have. Thank you for that nice birthday wish you posted. That was a classy move, and it made my day nicer. I hope yours goes well too. ..Please always feel free to disagree with me. I don't really want to make you feel you shouldn't. (like what I wrote to Deyana here..most people think I'm full of it when i talk like this, and if you see it as nonsense too, fire away! I promise not to dent unfortunately, it is sad that you don't believe that the wind exists. no one has ever seen the wind. we know it exists though, because we see the results of the wind
|
|
|
Post by Hunny on Jun 5, 2012 20:43:27 GMT
It's true Deyana. Geller was a performer. However, don't give up the idea of mind over matter. What you think IS what becomes. There are scads of books you could read that explain that. I'd suggest Wayne Dyer 1 - The Power Of Intention and 2 - Manifest Your Destiny . These are books that teach that what you think of happens. That it is a power you have to use. I love listening to Dyer speak on PBS at Pledge Drive, he's inspiring because he does not offer a God to have to ask, he offers you your own power to create, simply by knowing what you need. It may sound a little like magic, but I'm a card-carrying atheist because i wont "believe in" things unless they're provable, yet I'm saying this functional spirituality he offers is reality. It's how we work. And it's all about developing your intuition. (He does back this up with science.) Dyer says think of it and it becomes, well, I tested that. I thought of some money, it came. So I thought of a bigger amount, it came. A couple times I could swear I kept a green light from changing just by needing it to with my mind. I've also gotten to where I can find where things are just by emptying my mind, and letting the hunch come where it is. And if there is danger just around a corner, I find I can sense that. Oh and if you need to get in touch with someone, think of them a lot; they'll sense it and call you! And here's an experiment you can do today: Sit in a crowd of people, pick someone at random and stare at the back of their head relentlessly. They'll get fidgety, then turn and look right at you. But how did they know?? Well, can you explain that without using the word "psychic"? And again, I'm a prove-it-to-me atheist, so I'm saying it isn't just kooky belief. There IS some "magic" to living. We DO have some power (remember i talked about intuition?) (it's about that, and also that we are connected to each other intuitively as well. You can create what Carl Jung called a "synchronicity" (google that! There's your backing science). So..I don't know if people can make objects move, but we can do a lot with intuition...so read! Develop your intuitive power! And enjoy ____________________________________________ @ Mike: I am sorry I came across the way I did to you yesterday. I had a talk with a couple people and well, it seems I took your opinion as a personal attack, and I shouldn't have. Thank you for that nice birthday wish you posted. That was a classy move, and it made my day nicer. I hope yours goes well too. ..Please always feel free to disagree with me. I don't really want to make you feel you shouldn't. (like what I wrote to Deyana here..most people think I'm full of it when i talk like this, and if you see it as nonsense too, fire away! I promise not to dent unfortunately, it is sad that you don't believe that the wind exists. no one has ever seen the wind. we know it exists though, because we see the results of the wind I used to go to meetings held -of all places *gasp*- in a church. There i heard it said often that people "tread innumerable paths to "God". I've always found it impossible to believe Christianity is real, or any organized religion for that matter, but I did learn to be spiritual there. I learned many valuable lessons about healing and helping others and being part of the whole... It changed me. At one point I even had what I was told was a "minor mystical experience". And in the end, oh I can't say i know there's no "god". To me the whole universe is "god"! So there is one already! But no, I just cant join a religion though. ...You can see what I'm saying though, right? I came a long way from abject atheism. I would now describe myself as "generically spiritual" lol! My hope is, if i should meet your "Father", He'll understand.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 5, 2012 20:45:15 GMT
Oh, lonewolf has gone? Sorry to hear that. I guess he might decide to come back at some point.... (Thanks for sticking up for me and the kind words though Mike . You are a gentleman ) Well if Uri Geller was a fake, I'd love to know his trick. It seems to me there is no conceivable way the metal in his hands would just bend before our eyes and with no one has much as touching it. (apart from him, but he never touched the part that was bending!). I do like the song 'imagine'. Any music ( or poetry or writings come to that), that make us think cannot be bad. I also like his 'War it over'. ( I wish). You know something else that always baffles me are - air waves. We can't see them but they are there and they do quite a bit work without us ever seeing or feeling them in any way.
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Jun 5, 2012 20:54:00 GMT
I have to say that this is one of the most appalling and nauseating songs I have ever had the misfortune to listen to. In the first place its melody is about on the same level as a pub song. Secondly, its lyrics are simultaneously insincere, hypocritical, patronising and nauseatingly twee. The idea of a multimillionaire like Lennon saying 'imagine no possessions' is on the same level of hypocrisy as when Himmler described the concentration camps in Germany as 'an act of care.' Lennon was a snob, a poseur, a fake (he put on his Scouse accent to try to pretend to be working class), and a vicious homophobe and anti-Semite (he once told Brian Epstein he was a 'queer Jew' for instance and he said it in a deliberately insulting and offensive way.) His political views were also a lot more right-wing than his admirers realise. He often expressed racist attitudes about blacks and Jews and he was also a strong supporter of police brutality towards demonstrators. One winter he organised a collection on behalf of the New York cops after they had been engaged in a particularly bad example of brutality against political activists. A loathsome man who was almost completely talent-free (I dislike McCartney almost as much and Harrison and Starr were the only Beatles towards whom I feel even a minute degree of affection.) damn my man, what crawled up your panties? i was never overly fond of the beatles, although i was the first one in school to have a beatle's haircut, since i was a stones fan, but, i did like a lot of their songs. during my hippie days, imagine was the theme song, the utopian dream for a perfect world. it actually is a blueprint for a perfect world, IF there were no humans. anyone who has ever lived in a commune knows that it is not possible. however, to come down on the song with the anvil as well as the hammer is a bit over the top. unfortunately, hunny is a heavy duty idealist, and i think that she honestly believes the garbage. actually, i suppose that having any dream at all is better than reality i'm sure that you have your ducks in a row as far as lennon is concerned, or you wouldn't make the claims. however, his public persona was completely different than your descriptions, and that is what the world knew him by
|
|
|
Post by sadie1263 on Jun 5, 2012 21:51:58 GMT
I always wondered what Uri Geller had against silverware.
|
|
|
Post by mikemarshall on Jun 6, 2012 20:25:22 GMT
The whole notion of ‘mind over matter’ is one that I find difficult to deal with, let alone accept. To begin with it implies a dualist concept of mental activity which is not a notion that I find persuasive. Even to use the expression ‘mind over matter’ requires us to assume that the mind is somehow NOT a material object or at least a material phenomenon.
Let me briefly outline my objections to the dualist conception of the mind. To begin with how do we (if in fact we DO) perceive an immaterial phenomenon or process? Jumbo has suggested the wind but we CAN feel the wind and also see its physical effects in sending currents of air to disperse other equally material substances. Sight is not our only sense; we also possess the faculties of touch, taste, smell and hearing. All of these senses help us to form a judgement about the physicality of an observation. It is my contention that so far NO unequivocal evidence of the existence of any kind of non-physical phenomena or processes has been adduced satisfactorily.
There is also the argument from Occam’s Razor, a principle that is often misquoted as ‘entities are not to be multiplied without necessity.’ Occam never made such a statement but he did write ‘it is vain to do with more what can be done with fewer.’ The corollary of this principle is in essence that if two rival theories each appear to explain the facts equally well but one is simpler than the other and does not require us to posit additional entities to make it work then the simpler theory is to be preferred.
It is simpler to assume the identity of mind and the brain – a physical object – than to posit an incorporeal mind that has an uncertain relationship with the brain. Of course Occam’s Razor is only a methodological principle and not a scientific law but practical experience over centuries has shown that it is almost invariably correct. Copernicus invoked it on behalf of the heliocentric view of the universe as did Einstein in explaining how his theory of relativity was a simpler account of the universe than the notion of a luminiferous ether.
Finally there is the argument from experience and from the structure of the brain. Consciousness among humans is invariably found located within a physical object, the brain. Our brain fires electrical impulses that appear to determine our actions and no thought has yet been found that did not originate within a human brain.
The brain IS matter; mental activity IS a physical process taking place within the brain. It seems impossible to regard the two things as separate in any way and if mind and matter ARE one and the same how CAN there possibly be such a thing as ‘mind over matter?’
Geller’s alleged powers of psychokinesis are simply the best known instances of that curious phenomenon. Many better but far less widely reported practitioners have achieved much more impressive results than Geller when tested under strict laboratory conditions.
Nor is it necessarily in conflict with current scientific orthodoxy to assume that psychokinesis – the alleged ability to control the movement of objects through mental activity – involves any kind of non-material force or process. If this faculty genuinely exists (and I am sufficiently persuaded by the evidence that it DOES) the obvious explanation is surely that electrical impulses are being sent out by the brain to an equally material object and that the principles behind the action are either derived from electro-magnetism or the two nuclear forces. It is an interaction of two MATERIAL elements resulting in an unusual but not mysterious PHYSICAL process.
|
|
|
Post by Hunny on Jun 7, 2012 12:33:52 GMT
The whole notion of ‘mind over matter’ is one that I find difficult to deal with, let alone accept. To begin with it implies a dualist concept of mental activity which is not a notion that I find persuasive. Even to use the expression ‘mind over matter’ requires us to assume that the mind is somehow NOT a material object or at least a material phenomenon. Let me briefly outline my objections to the dualist conception of the mind. To begin with how do we (if in fact we DO) perceive an immaterial phenomenon or process? Jumbo has suggested the wind but we CAN feel the wind and also see its physical effects in sending currents of air to disperse other equally material substances. Sight is not our only sense; we also possess the faculties of touch, taste, smell and hearing. All of these senses help us to form a judgement about the physicality of an observation. It is my contention that so far NO unequivocal evidence of the existence of any kind of non-physical phenomena or processes has been adduced satisfactorily. There is also the argument from Occam’s Razor, a principle that is often misquoted as ‘entities are not to be multiplied without necessity.’ Occam never made such a statement but he did write ‘it is vain to do with more what can be done with fewer.’ The corollary of this principle is in essence that if two rival theories each appear to explain the facts equally well but one is simpler than the other and does not require us to posit additional entities to make it work then the simpler theory is to be preferred. It is simpler to assume the identity of mind and the brain – a physical object – than to posit an incorporeal mind that has an uncertain relationship with the brain. Of course Occam’s Razor is only a methodological principle and not a scientific law but practical experience over centuries has shown that it is almost invariably correct. Copernicus invoked it on behalf of the heliocentric view of the universe as did Einstein in explaining how his theory of relativity was a simpler account of the universe than the notion of a luminiferous ether. Finally there is the argument from experience and from the structure of the brain. Consciousness among humans is invariably found located within a physical object, the brain. Our brain fires electrical impulses that appear to determine our actions and no thought has yet been found that did not originate within a human brain. The brain IS matter; mental activity IS a physical process taking place within the brain. It seems impossible to regard the two things as separate in any way and if mind and matter ARE one and the same how CAN there possibly be such a thing as ‘mind over matter?’ Geller’s alleged powers of psychokinesis are simply the best known instances of that curious phenomenon. Many better but far less widely reported practitioners have achieved much more impressive results than Geller when tested under strict laboratory conditions. Nor is it necessarily in conflict with current scientific orthodoxy to assume that psychokinesis – the alleged ability to control the movement of objects through mental activity – involves any kind of non-material force or process. If this faculty genuinely exists (and I am sufficiently persuaded by the evidence that it DOES) the obvious explanation is surely that electrical impulses are being sent out by the brain to an equally material object and that the principles behind the action are either derived from electro-magnetism or the two nuclear forces. It is an interaction of two MATERIAL elements resulting in an unusual but not mysterious PHYSICAL process. ...Scientists have split particles off from each other, that live paired, and found that even with distance between them, if one hits an obstacle and gets deflected, the other changes course as if it had hit the same obstacle. But how could mere particles 'communicate' with each other. And how could that communication take no time to occur? Or if it isn't communication, then how could they have a connection where there is (seemingly) none? ...People regularly occasionally know what another is thinking, with no physical cues or cause to point to. Again, how? There seems to be the same unanswered questions here. .....I think this is evidence that the whole universe and all the particles that form it, is connected, that there is a oneness to it. And I've read of physicists concluding that the universe is like a "giant mind". Indeed, it seems as if imagination is what creates physical reality to correspond with it. ............I don't know if I've made this make sense. But I'm saying why wouldn't someone be able to imagine a thing moves, and it moves? I love the movie, "Phenomenon", where we see the main character suffer a brain cancer, that makes him smarter and smarter as the cells multiply. He becomes smart enough to understand things we cannot. He begins to move things with his mind. He explains -using a hundred square mile stand of a type of tree, as an example- that just as what seems to be thousands of "individual" trees is actually all one organism because the roots all interconnect, under the surface, so are we humans all connected to each other (*Jung concurs with his "unconscious collective"), and so is all life interconnected. And so he stands there, demonstrating how he can make a tree bend towards him, and explains -what seems most interesting of all to me- that you dont command the tree to bend, you ask it to! (So now we've switched subjects..): "You just ask it", he says, "and of course it will "agree" (after all, you agreed with it) . But if you were to command it to do as you wish -the way we do with each other, and crop farming and virtually everything- you would make it sick!Demanding sickens / asking gets agreeal!!!* To me that's as meaningful and profound a revelation as there is. So..I do hope it made sense to one or two, lol! If not, watch the movie! It's really good, even just as a movie. *Think about how we war, and argue, and fight (ie "demand"), but we do not think to try being nice. We think we have to "make" things in the physical world conform to our wishes. But as in the example of crop-farming, we deplete the land (by "demanding" what it "must" give), while simple naked people in forests knew better than that, and can keep a piece of land productive indefinitely, because they respect what IT needs as well as what they ASK of it.. Oh but I'm over-simplifying and not getting the magic of this thought across. Well, watch the movie then! And think of demanding versus co-operating. Intelligence cooperates. Brutish low-brows 'demand'. So the movie shows that we are dumb!
(And as to our original topic, implies that if we were smarter we would indeed be able to manipulate the physical world with just imagination.
I dont know that that is true. (And I dont know that it isnt). But I loved the forward-thinking...
______________________ @ Deyana: You really did good with this thread. It's great.
|
|
|
Post by mikemarshall on Jun 7, 2012 20:28:09 GMT
Thank you for your thoughtful and well-argued post, Hunny.
Unfortunately I cannot stay online very long tonight so I will respond to your excellent response tomorrow,
All I will briefly say is that the divisibility of an object (no matter how small) does not affect its status as a physical object.
Are you familiar with the work of Karl Pribram, David Bohm, Rupert Sheldrake and other scientists working in the field of holography, brain science and cosmology?
One of the most interesting and intriguing ideas of the last thirty years in my opinion is the notion of a holographic universe.
Certainly Pribram in particular has conducted experiments that appear to show that the human brain is structured along holographic principles.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2012 15:48:36 GMT
Thanks, honey. I thought it might take off. I've just been reading through the last few replies and I'm fascinated. I admit I don't know as much as mike, honey and some others on this thread, but it's really good to see and learn the differing view points on here.
I think there is much we don't know about the human brain. I heard somewhere that we only use a small percentage of our full brain potential. Which means that most of the human brain is still a mystery. What are we really capable of that we don't know as yet? How to expand and tap into that very high percentage that lies dormant? Have some people found a way to at least tap into parts of their brains that most of us can't? being psychic comes to mind. Some are much more aware of what will happen or about what others are thinking than is the norm. I've heard a well known psychic say that it's even a burden for her, because she picks up on when people are sick, are going to die, their anger and other negative thoughts.
|
|
|
Post by Hunny on Jun 19, 2012 17:48:50 GMT
Thanks, honey. I thought it might take off. I've just been reading through the last few replies and I'm fascinated. I admit I don't know as much as mike, honey and some others on this thread, but it's really good to see and learn the differing view points on here. I think there is much we don't know about the human brain. I heard somewhere that we only use a small percentage of our full brain potential. Which means that most of the human brain is still a mystery. What are we really capable of that we don't know as yet? How to expand and tap into that very high percentage that lies dormant? Have some people found a way to at least tap into parts of their brains that most of us can't? being psychic comes to mind. Some are much more aware of what will happen or about what others are thinking than is the norm. I've heard a well known psychic say that it's even a burden for her, because she picks up on when people are sick, are going to die, their anger and other negative thoughts. I've noticed that diabetes has a feel. I know when someone is diabetic. They don't have to tell me. I can feel it. (You're gonna' think I'm weird, but...ya' ever ride a roller coaster? Well, it's like that feeling when the bottom drops out (when you suddenly start going downward very fast) ..I don't actually enjoy it.)) I'd like to say I can feel other things too, but ...i figure 'sensing' stuff like that is like a muscle you've never used: it needs to be worked out to work at all, and the more you use it, the stronger it gets. Well, I haven't spent any real time trying to develop these things. I just know what I occasionally sense and get surprised by. It is there!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2012 16:45:00 GMT
hmmm... interesting. You may be what is known as a 'sensitive'. Another word for a psychic really. Because that is all they are. They simply have the ability to sense many thing that others block out. The reason why children are more likely to have better psychic abilities...
|
|
|
Post by sadie1263 on Jun 29, 2012 19:52:04 GMT
I knew when my husband was shot at......I was asleep and woke up with my heart beating really fast....I didn't know what had happened.....but I knew it was intense and had to do with him. I knew when my german shepherd was killed. We were on a trip out of town and someone was home watching them. Someone thru firecrackers in our yard and he broke a gate to get out and away and got hit in the street, again I was asleep and woke up crying, saying we had to get home because of him......there were other dogs at home.....but I knew it was him. I didn't know when my youngest son was in his accident last year......I was asleep at the time too.....it has always bothered me that I didn't feel that one.....but sometimes I wonder if it had to do with him being unconscious.....if he wasn't putting out those signals.
My father is the best at it......any of us can think about him really hard.....need him for some reason.....and he will show up or he will call.
I believe with loved ones those emotional ties bind you in a way we don't always see......
|
|
|
Post by sadie1263 on Jun 29, 2012 19:54:48 GMT
I'd like to say I can feel other things too, but ...i figure 'sensing' stuff like that is like a muscle you've never used: it needs to be worked out to work at all, and the more you use it, the stronger it gets. Well, I haven't spent any real time trying to develop these things. I just know what I occasionally sense and get surprised by. It is there! My yoga teacher was like that.....there is just a spiritual center to her that rolls off of her......makes you feel peaceful just being around her.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2012 0:11:14 GMT
sadie, yes, with our loved ones, we can sense it more. I know I do as well...
I live in Canada and my mom lives in the UK, a couple of years ago she had a break-in and she had to confront the attackers. It was very traumatic for her, and that very time I knew something was wrong. Even from thousands of miles away.
|
|