♫anna♫
Global Moderator
Aug 18 2017 - Always In Our Hearts
The Federal Reserve Act is the Betrayal of the American Revolution!
e x a l t | s m i t e
karma:
Posts: 11,769
|
Post by ♫anna♫ on Jun 24, 2012 22:17:10 GMT
www.foxnews.com/us/2012/06/24/man-allegedly-beats-school-bus-driver-to-death-after-accidentally-knocked-off/ QUOTE: Man allegedly beats school bus driver to death after he accidentally knocked off mirrorJune 24, 2012 New York Post NEW YORK – A Bronx school bus driver died yesterday from the beating he suffered after he accidentally knocked a side-view mirror from a double-parked car, a spokeswoman for his bus company said. Juan Delvalle, 65, never regained consciousness after Joey Scott, 30, allegedly punched him twice in the face June 11, said Carolyn Daly, a spokeswoman for the Atlantic Express bus company. He died peacefully at St. Barnabas Hospital in the Bronx. “The family had been struggling all week with whether or not to take him off life support,” Daly said.. “The swelling and bleeding in the brain were extensive,” Daly said. “He was hooked up to a ventilator and that was the only reason he could breathe. He never regained consciousness. It was a very, very severe injury.” Delvalle had asked to not be hooked up to artificial life support. Once his family gathered last night — some from as far as Colorado and Puerto Rico — doctors turned off the life support machines, and he died at 6:19 p.m. Delvalle, who'd driven for Atlantic Express for eight years, was driving two middle-school students in his yellow bus on Anthony Avenue near Echo Place when he clipped Scott's illegally-parked Chrysler Sebring. The passing school bus ripped off the Chrysler's mirror. In an extreme display of road-rage, Scott lost it and punched the grandfather twice, police said. Delvalle fell backward and his head struck the pavement. He was rushed to the hospital and never woke up again. Delvalle's family and friends hope the Bronx DA's charges will charge Scott with homicide, Daly said. “You don’t lose it over a mirror and you certainly don’t punch a 65-year-old man wearing a uniform who’s got children in his care,” Daly siad. Scott, who has a long rap sheet, fled the scene. Cops found him at his Tremont apartment, and needed two hours to negotiate his arrest. Scott remains in custody, unable to post $250,000 cash bond. He has a court date Monday.
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Jun 25, 2012 10:06:02 GMT
the worthless garbage obviously should be convicted of first degree murder and executed. unfortunately, that is new york
|
|
|
Post by Synonym on Jun 25, 2012 23:56:08 GMT
the worthless garbage obviously should be convicted of first degree murder and executed. unfortunately, that is new york Well, we are told that "Man allegedly beats school bus driver to death after he accidentally knocked off mirror" (my emphasis) and I am inclined to believe that it was an accident. But I wonder if the car-owner will try the defence of saying that he thought it was a deliberate attack on his property and so was just defending his property by killing the attacker of it as is his moral right. I wonder if he will try that defence. Poor bus driver though.
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Jun 26, 2012 10:30:09 GMT
the worthless garbage obviously should be convicted of first degree murder and executed. unfortunately, that is new york Well, we are told that "Man allegedly beats school bus driver to death after he accidentally knocked off mirror" (my emphasis) and I am inclined to believe that it was an accident. But I wonder if the car-owner will try the defence of saying that he thought it was a deliberate attack on his property and so was just defending his property by killing the attacker of it as is his moral right. I wonder if he will try that defence. Poor bus driver though. that is no defense
|
|
|
Post by Synonym on Jun 26, 2012 11:22:40 GMT
Why, because you 'know' in this case it was an accident? Unless if I have misunderstood your position, if a person deliberately damages an item of property of mine, even if only a pen, then I am justified in killing them. Or is that only when they are trying to steal my pen?
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Jun 26, 2012 16:56:47 GMT
Why, because you 'know' in this case it was an accident? Unless if I have misunderstood your position, if a person deliberately damages an item of property of mine, even if only a pen, then I am justified in killing them. Or is that only when they are trying to steal my pen? you certainly don't understand much
|
|
|
Post by Synonym on Jun 26, 2012 17:56:15 GMT
In that case I am glad I misunderstood you. I had the impression that you believed it to be justified to kill a person who is attempting to steal so much as a pen, in defence of your property, that there would be no rational reason not kill them etc. I am glad I got this wrong.
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Jun 26, 2012 19:02:07 GMT
In that case I am glad I misunderstood you. I had the impression that you believed it to be justified to kill a person who is attempting to steal so much as a pen, in defence of your property, that there would be no rational reason not kill them etc. I am glad I got this wrong. it IS legal to kill someone attempting to steal so much as a pen from your house, or your car, or anywhere that you have a right to be
|
|