|
Post by Deleted on Aug 17, 2011 15:25:38 GMT
But that's a risk they take. If you want to gamble, you have to take the loss on the chin. If it is true that it was the mother who showed the site to the children, then explained it was her it was referring to, it says a lot about her. Do parents really take their children aside after a domestic argument and say "Daddy (or Mummy) said some really hurtful things to me last night" then go on to repeat them? Because that is in effect what she has done.
|
|
|
Post by trubble on Aug 17, 2011 15:25:56 GMT
If he feels that the children should not be exposed to the arguments then he should make sure that he doesn't put them on the internet. Simple as. NOPE!! the FACT is that, if the worthless ex wife cared anything about the kids, she would not have pointed them to the blog. the chances that they would come across it on their own are absolutely ZERO. she, and she alone, is TOTALLY responsible for any harm that the kids might suffer. he certainly bears NO responsibility whatsoever She shouldn't have told them about it. That's for sure. His actions are not as direct as hers, but he bears responsibility nonetheless. For one thing, now that he knows that they know, he has decided to continue with it.
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Aug 17, 2011 18:53:25 GMT
NOPE!! the FACT is that, if the worthless ex wife cared anything about the kids, she would not have pointed them to the blog. the chances that they would come across it on their own are absolutely ZERO. she, and she alone, is TOTALLY responsible for any harm that the kids might suffer. he certainly bears NO responsibility whatsoever She shouldn't have told them about it. That's for sure. His actions are not as direct as hers, but he bears responsibility nonetheless. For one thing, now that he knows that they know, he has decided to continue with it. not at all. why shouldn't he continue it. SHE already caused the damage to the kids. he had NO hand it that at all. besides, in reality, it's best for them to know just how worthless their mother really is
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 17, 2011 19:42:43 GMT
Can't agree there Jumbo. If he continued to post new stuff about his wife knowing that his children might read it, he was just as bad as she is. Okay, it was a nasty tactic on her part, but his children should come first.
|
|
|
Post by sadie1263 on Aug 17, 2011 19:57:35 GMT
Well....again.....I think there is a real problem all the way around. It looks like their custody stuff has gone on for years........and I think there is a lot of passive aggression in what he is doing.
But legally....he has a right to do it....and if in doing it....there are other people reaching out and talking about their shared problems......then maybe it is helpful to them. I went to the blog and looked thru different areas.....and there are women writing in but saying it is the reverse and they have a psycho ex husband and seem to share stories.
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Aug 17, 2011 20:03:36 GMT
Can't agree there Jumbo. If he continued to post new stuff about his wife knowing that his children might read it, he was just as bad as she is. Okay, it was a nasty tactic on her part, but his children should come first. wrong on two counts. HE is not the one allowing the kids to read it, and, SHE is the one who directed their attention to it in the first place. in all probability, he doesn't want the kids to know everything about their mother, but, SHE forced them to.
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Aug 17, 2011 20:07:16 GMT
Well....again.....I think there is a real problem all the way around. It looks like their custody stuff has gone on for years........and I think there is a lot of passive aggression in what he is doing. But legally....he has a right to do it....and if in doing it....there are other people reaching out and talking about their shared problems......then maybe it is helpful to them. I went to the blog and looked thru different areas.....and there are women writing in but saying it is the reverse and they have a psycho ex husband and seem to share stories. of course it's aggression, although not particularly passive. although it can't be proven, so therefore has no basis for any kind of moronic court order, i'm certain that his intent is to hurt her. as i said though, his intent can't be proven, so is totally irrelevant. nonetheless, he IS doing a public service by providing a place where people can vent about their exes
|
|
♫anna♫
Global Moderator
Aug 18 2017 - Always In Our Hearts
The Federal Reserve Act is the Betrayal of the American Revolution!
e x a l t | s m i t e
karma:
Posts: 11,769
|
Post by ♫anna♫ on Sept 23, 2011 13:51:56 GMT
This YouTube video lets both the ex husband and ex wife speak. A tough case.
I lean towards letting this man keep his childish blog primarily because he is obsessed with venting! I could imagine someone like this becoming a stalker and physically dangerous towards his ( her ) ex spouse. I believe some violent crimes following a bitter divorce would not occur, if the enraged ex vented on a blog instead!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 23, 2011 15:28:04 GMT
Our walking group was joined recently by a newcomer, who said she usually walked with a friend going through a divorce, who liked to talk it over. From what I can gather, "talking it over" involved running down her ex at length. The newcomer had clearly made up her mind that the man (whom she didn't know at all) was pure evil, but when I asked for examples of what he had done, she couldn't produce anything that seemed bad enough to elevate him to the status of arch demon. The most terrible things seemed to be contacting his ex in-laws to commiserate on their bad health, and having a grandfather who was a paedophile.
I suppose it is better to vent on a message board than expect friends to listen to your venom. But recalling what Trouble said earlier on this thread about reinforcement, I am now wondering if he best thing to do is put up, shut up and move on.
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Sept 24, 2011 12:43:29 GMT
Our walking group was joined recently by a newcomer, who said she usually walked with a friend going through a divorce, who liked to talk it over. From what I can gather, "talking it over" involved running down her ex at length. The newcomer had clearly made up her mind that the man (whom she didn't know at all) was pure evil, but when I asked for examples of what he had done, she couldn't produce anything that seemed bad enough to elevate him to the status of arch demon. The most terrible things seemed to be contacting his ex in-laws to commiserate on their bad health, and having a grandfather who was a paedophile. I suppose it is better to vent on a message board than expect friends to listen to your venom. But recalling what Trouble said earlier on this thread about reinforcement, I am now wondering if he best thing to do is put up, shut up and move on. that all depends on how badly you have been screwed over. when someone is dumb enough to start a war with me, I am the only one who can decide when it ends. hell, riverside county started a war with me on january 18, 1963, when i was fifteen years old, and i STILL look for every opportunity to hassle them
|
|
|
Post by june on Sept 24, 2011 19:15:21 GMT
Our walking group was joined recently by a newcomer, who said she usually walked with a friend going through a divorce, who liked to talk it over. From what I can gather, "talking it over" involved running down her ex at length. The newcomer had clearly made up her mind that the man (whom she didn't know at all) was pure evil, but when I asked for examples of what he had done, she couldn't produce anything that seemed bad enough to elevate him to the status of arch demon. The most terrible things seemed to be contacting his ex in-laws to commiserate on their bad health, and having a grandfather who was a paedophile. I suppose it is better to vent on a message board than expect friends to listen to your venom. But recalling what Trouble said earlier on this thread about reinforcement, I am now wondering if he best thing to do is put up, shut up and move on. that all depends on how badly you have been screwed over. when someone is dumb enough to start a war with me, I am the only one who can decide when it ends. hell, riverside county started a war with me on january 18, 1963, when i was fifteen years old, and i STILL look for every opportunity to hassle them I'm intrigued - what did they do? ;D
|
|