|
Post by DAS (formerly BushAdmirer) on Jul 6, 2016 22:48:52 GMT
The problem is not radical Islam. It's not extremist Islam. It's pure Islam.
Islam and the west are fundamentally incompatible. That is Islam in its pure form. It is opposed to everything that the west holds dear.
Their values and our values are fundamentally. Irreconcilable. And incompatible. They are at odds. Why. Because: There is no god but allah. And Mohammed is his prophet.
What does that mean? That means that alllahs law. As given to the Muslims through the koran through the Prophet Mohammed. Is the only law that matters. It transcends. Everybody else's laws . and every law of any other civil authority. The American constitution. Is nothing compared to alllah's law Why? because if you are a pure Muslim. An authentic Muslim. The constitution doesn't get you to paradise. To get to paradise Allah;s law does.
What does this mean? Let me give you an example. They can never accept the First Amendment of the US Constitution. A Christian in Muslim society. can’t convert a Muslim to christianity. Religious expression is gone. Religious freedom is gone. You cannot blaspheme against the Prophet Mohammed or Allah's law. The punishment is death. Remember Charlie Hebdo. That's why you have to massacre cartoonists. Freedom of speech is impossible under Islam. Democracy itself is impossible under islam. Tolerance of other faiths is impossible under Islam. Tolerance for gays and lesbians is impossible under Islam. To treat women as first class citizens equal to men is impossible under Islam. It's impossible. It's impossible.
Political correctness for me is over. It's over. Because you need to know the truth. There's only one policy now that can result from this reality you have to look at reality in the eyes.
We need a screening process, whereby devout Muslims are not allowed to immigrate to western countries. They can never In the end be good citizens. Their allegiance to Islam trumps their allegiance to our laws. They can come as visitors they can come as tourists they can come as heads of state. We can form an alliance and fight side by side against Isis and al-Qaeda that we can do.
But to expect to bring them in the way the Europeans have been doing, and the way Obama and Hillary are doing, in big numbers, is a recipe not just for suicide. but for the Islamization of the west and America.
Now let me make one last mother of all points. To the ACLU. To the Council On American Islamic Relations. To the Boston Herald to the Boston Globe. Rachel Maddow, Channel four channel five channel seven channel 25 Charlie Baker Maurice Healy and ultimately CNN fox. And the white house here is my challenge to the establishment. It's a very simple challenge. What are the Islamic terrorists doing now. What is ISIS and Al-Qaeda and the other butchers doing now. That the Prophet Mohammed himself did not do. What are they doing that he didn't do. Did he have child brides. Yes. Did he engage in polygamy. Yes. Did he say Islam was to spread through conquest and the sword yes. Did he slaughter Jews and Christians yes. Did he bless the beheadings yes. Did he bless the throwing of homosexuals off of buildings or stoning them yes. Did he call for the imposition of a global Caliphate a world Muslim empire based on Sharia law. Yes. they are just doing. What their prophet did. They're just following his example.
Radical Islam is not a problem. Pure Islam is the problem
|
|
♫anna♫
Global Moderator
Aug 18 2017 - Always In Our Hearts
The Federal Reserve Act is the Betrayal of the American Revolution!
e x a l t | s m i t e
karma:
Posts: 11,769
|
Post by ♫anna♫ on Jul 7, 2016 1:50:26 GMT
Spot on DAS (formerly BushAdmirer) ! I do believe there are villians in the finance elite that are enabling Islam as Muhammed taught it to rise again. The senseless wars against Ghadaffi, Assad and Saddam Hussein enabled ISIS which is pure Koranic Islam to form their states of Sharia terror.
The media went bonkers when the Ugandan government considered executing homosexuals since they were desperately looking for non Islamic bogeymen to make everything politically correct and equal. Iran executes people routinely for this and other 'offenses'. The media is pretty quiet on that.
All the fake civil rights groups hush up when Muslims are killing their people or give some low impact general or ridiculous statement like comparing this barbarianism to modern Western civilisation.
|
|
♫anna♫
Global Moderator
Aug 18 2017 - Always In Our Hearts
The Federal Reserve Act is the Betrayal of the American Revolution!
e x a l t | s m i t e
karma:
Posts: 11,769
|
Post by ♫anna♫ on Jul 12, 2016 2:08:06 GMT
Dr. Warren gives an interview and discusses why Islam has been so successful and any red flags of Islam thanks to it's "dualistic nature" go under the radar screen. DAS (formerly BushAdmirer) @menantol blc iamjumbo
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 12, 2016 5:34:41 GMT
Dr. Warren gives an interview and discusses why Islam has been so successful and any red flags of Islam thanks to it's "dualistic nature" go under the radar screen. DAS (formerly BushAdmirer) @menantol blc iamjumbo Anna, an excellent video. It clearly describes how those who speak for Islam become mentally solidified when faced with facts about Islam. That is, critical thinking is rejected because Islam doesn’t stand up to such thinking. But as in other dialogs where critical thought is brought to the dialog, the one bringing the facts of Islam becomes the target of hate for simply speaking the truth. This blind spot in the minds of some is interesting when realizing that Islam is focused on the end of Western Culture. That reality is not debated, is not accepted, and yet in the end Muslims accept that preferred Islamic end. In other words, those of the West not only accept this view without debate, but they empower the Islamic path to completed Jihad.
|
|
♫anna♫
Global Moderator
Aug 18 2017 - Always In Our Hearts
The Federal Reserve Act is the Betrayal of the American Revolution!
e x a l t | s m i t e
karma:
Posts: 11,769
|
Post by ♫anna♫ on Jul 12, 2016 14:38:23 GMT
www.politicalislam.com/migration-as-jihad/ QUOTE: Migration as JihadMigration is part of the doctrine of jihad. Migration is so important that the Islamic calendar is based upon the Hijra, Mohammed’s migration from Mecca to Medina. Why? Because it was migration that lead to the creation of jihad in Medina. And it was jihad that made Islam triumphant.
In the past Muslims tended to stay in Islamic countries. Today, the new politics is to migrate to Kafir lands and immerse themselves in local politics. This is the jihad of money, writing and speech. Their politics is to bring the Sharia to Kafir culture. An example is using Islamic money is to build departments in universities that will support Sharia and never criticize Islam. UNQUOTE Migration is seen as part of Jihad by Fundamentalist Muslims. They intend to replace in time the decadent Western multiculturalism with a totalitarian Islamic monoculturalism. DAS (formerly BushAdmirer) @menantol iamjumbo blc
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2016 16:44:50 GMT
If it were not for the intense and unrealistic dislike for Bill Warner, points can be made about the movements of those in contention with the Roman Empire. In particular, the invasion from Africa into Europe was old stuff (in a way) by the time of the Islamic European conquests.
The first, Second, and third, Punic Wars between the Romans and the Carthaginians allows for the making of the case that these wars changed the structure of Roman government as well as Roman society to the point that older Roman forms were done away with. The point is that this occurred by Carthaginian invasions of Europe and covered much of the same European territory that Islam would control hundreds of years later. The result of both was much the same with the powers of Europe beating back the incursion of the African (albeit different ones) invaders.
With Rome’s ascendancy over Carthage, Rome was brought face to face with a new people the Berbers of North Western Africa. Yes, Rome had conquered Egypt but they had not come into direct contact with the peoples living in and on the North side of the Sahara and West of Egypt, the Berbers. That is, Jugurtha, King of the Numidians, the Nomads of Eastern Algeria. These Numidians knew how to live near and in the Saharan Desert (it was less arid in those days). These Numidians were great horse warriors and as a side note, while we think of them today as the riders of camels, it was the Romans who brought camels to this part of the world (from Asia) to function in desert climes better than horses.
The war between King Jugurtha and Rome was disliked in Rome so much that it generated strong dissatisfaction by the Roman people with the Roman Senate. As a result brought Gaius Marius, politically posing as a popular reformer, to the Consulship. Ah, it seems that politics never change.
The point is that, the result of the aggression by a culture from Africa into Europe brought European defensive invasions of Africa with Africa the loser. This came to happen again with subsequent invasion of Europe by the expansion of the Islamic caliphate. Here too it was pushed back to Africa.
The primary differences between the two periods is that the war between Carthage and Rome was of two (somewhat) similar cultures with both expanding of territories due to economic and power requirements with neither caring that much about the societies conquered as long as they payed taxes and supported the new rulers. Of course the causative facts changed with the invasion of Islam in that now it was driven by the need for near 100% religious conversions and a lack of acceptance of any other view of the world.
The point being, that the items presented by Bill Warner were both factual as representing the Islamic incursions into Europe, and were reflective of earlies contentions between Europe and Africa.
|
|