♫anna♫
Global Moderator
Aug 18 2017 - Always In Our Hearts
The Federal Reserve Act is the Betrayal of the American Revolution!
e x a l t | s m i t e
karma:
Posts: 11,769
|
Post by ♫anna♫ on Mar 23, 2013 17:34:40 GMT
I think it's ridiculous that a sperm donor should be financially responsible for a child, especially after being assured that he would have no financial responsibilities for any child born!
|
|
|
Post by Synonym on Mar 23, 2013 19:40:51 GMT
OTOH, a person could father a child unintentionally if the contraception fails, or none was used. They, unlike the sperm donor, did not purposefully provide the material with the intent it be used to create the child, yet are expected to pay if one is created.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2013 7:22:57 GMT
I haven't watched the video, but presume that the donor didn't do it through any recognised organisation. It is my understanding that unless you do, the UK may hold you liable for child maintenance. It is of course down to the woman to give a name; if she gave her word not to reveal his identity, she should have kept silent
|
|