|
Post by iamjumbo on Jan 14, 2010 15:03:16 GMT
i don't find Mr. Lively's views dangerous or frightening. Really not? Not even considering the Ugandan legislation they've helped give legitimacy to? But do they? I have never heard af anyone 'encouraging' any such thing. Have you any evidence that 'activists' are doing that? And is homosexuality really such an enticing option that it's likely encouragement is enough to override an individual's attraction to the other sex? your primary problem is that you are laboring under the delusion that anyone is born gay, instead of acknowledging the REALITY that it is strictly CHOICE
|
|
|
Post by riotgrrl on Jan 14, 2010 15:04:20 GMT
Really not? Not even considering the Ugandan legislation they've helped give legitimacy to? But do they? I have never heard af anyone 'encouraging' any such thing. Have you any evidence that 'activists' are doing that? And is homosexuality really such an enticing option that it's likely encouragement is enough to override an individual's attraction to the other sex? your primary problem is that you are laboring under the delusion that anyone is born gay, instead of acknowledging the REALITY that it is strictly CHOICE The scientific evidence to date would suggest that you are probably wrong.
|
|
|
Post by riotgrrl on Jan 14, 2010 15:08:23 GMT
Anna, in your reply to me on the other thread you imply (I think) that this 'fairy tale about two princes falling in love' constitutes 'recritment literature' all by itself: But since the story as stated here all it seems to be doing is telling children that people do fall in love with members of their own sex. Whether their unions are called civil partnerships, or marriage, or whether they just live together without any official recognition at all, seems to me to have no bearing on whether children should be told such unions exist, which is quite a different question. But if I simply tell children something about the variety of human experience and the different groups that exist within society, am I thereby 'recruiting' into those groups? syphillis entered the human race by chaps screwing sheep. if you are going to honestly teach children true history, you have to teach them that. of course, if you fail to teach them that putting their peter in a sheep's azz is wrong, then yes, you would be condoning it. EXACTLY the same situation here This is news to me. I have never previously heard that syphillis was caused by human-ovine copulation. Is there any evidence for this astonishing assertion?
|
|
|
Post by june on Jan 14, 2010 19:32:53 GMT
syphillis entered the human race by chaps screwing sheep. if you are going to honestly teach children true history, you have to teach them that. of course, if you fail to teach them that putting their peter in a sheep's azz is wrong, then yes, you would be condoning it. EXACTLY the same situation here This is news to me. I have never previously heard that syphillis was caused by human-ovine copulation. Is there any evidence for this astonishing assertion? No there isn't Riot but your post made me laugh out loud!
|
|
|
Post by june on Jan 14, 2010 23:17:22 GMT
""In this bitter and mean old world we live in love should be celebrated in all its forms."" should it?? peados say they ""love"" children.......love a much over used word to cover desire in amny cases well mouse you are again talking about sex rather than love. ;D Love is wonderful sex is something quite different but can also be wonderful
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Jan 15, 2010 11:50:59 GMT
your primary problem is that you are laboring under the delusion that anyone is born gay, instead of acknowledging the REALITY that it is strictly CHOICE The scientific evidence to date would suggest that you are probably wrong. hardly. there is NO scientific evidence which lends any credence to it being anything other than choice. they keep trying, but, as with anything else that is totally non existent, they never find it
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Jan 15, 2010 11:55:12 GMT
syphillis entered the human race by chaps screwing sheep. if you are going to honestly teach children true history, you have to teach them that. of course, if you fail to teach them that putting their peter in a sheep's azz is wrong, then yes, you would be condoning it. EXACTLY the same situation here This is news to me. I have never previously heard that syphillis was caused by human-ovine copulation. Is there any evidence for this astonishing assertion? it's been a long time since i learned it, so i don't recall. i shall get back to you however nonetheless, it's really irrelevant. i just used it as an example. the point is that if you teach kids that something which is inherently wrong exists, without teaching them that it is inherently wrong, you are condoning the wrong
|
|
|
Post by randomvioce on Jan 15, 2010 12:42:49 GMT
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Jan 15, 2010 23:16:58 GMT
hardly. there is NO scientific evidence which lends any credence to it being anything other than choice. they keep trying, but, as with anything else that is totally non existent, they never find it[ scientific evidence means PROOF that there is a gene which causes homosexuality. until you find that, my statement stands as the truth
|
|
|
Post by mikemarshall on Jan 15, 2010 23:21:23 GMT
It is bad enough that such people exist without exposing children needlessly to propaganda endorsing their perversions!
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Jan 16, 2010 12:13:46 GMT
It is bad enough that such people exist without exposing children needlessly to propaganda endorsing their perversions! exactly. it's unconscionable for the schools to be following the nambla agenda
|
|
♫anna♫
Global Moderator
Aug 18 2017 - Always In Our Hearts
The Federal Reserve Act is the Betrayal of the American Revolution!
e x a l t | s m i t e
karma:
Posts: 11,769
|
Post by ♫anna♫ on Jan 16, 2010 16:17:04 GMT
It is bad enough that such people exist without exposing children needlessly to propaganda endorsing their perversions! True Mike! These homosexual fairy tales are indeed propaganda for a homosexual life style! I opened this thread with a report about how Massaschusett's schoolchildren, under age 10, are forced to read the homosexual fairy tale depicted below on YouTube! At this young impressionable age some psychologists believe children are already in a semi-homosexual phase of development. This "fairy tale" is obviously propoganda designed to steer children into a homosexual mindset.
Imagine the outrage of the homosexual lobby if propective homosexual partners were mocked, like the prospective female marital partners in this suspect PC story!
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Jan 16, 2010 18:01:45 GMT
It is bad enough that such people exist without exposing children needlessly to propaganda endorsing their perversions! True Mike! These homosexual fairy tales are indeed propaganda for a homosexual life style! I opened this thread with a report about how Massaschusett's schoolchildren, under age 10, are forced to read the homosexual fairy tale depicted below on YouTube! At this young impressionable age some psychologists believe children are already in a semi-homosexual phase of development. This "fairy tale" is obviously propoganda designed to steer children into a homosexual mindset.
Imagine the outrage of the homosexual lobby if propective homosexual partners were mocked, like the prospective female marital partners in this suspect PC story!you can't expect anything but lowlife degeneracy from lowlife degenerates
|
|
|
Post by june on Jan 17, 2010 0:30:32 GMT
True Mike! These homosexual fairy tales are indeed propaganda for a homosexual life style! I opened this thread with a report about how Massaschusett's schoolchildren, under age 10, are forced to read the homosexual fairy tale depicted below on YouTube! At this young impressionable age some psychologists believe children are already in a semi-homosexual phase of development. This "fairy tale" is obviously propoganda designed to steer children into a homosexual mindset.
Imagine the outrage of the homosexual lobby if propective homosexual partners were mocked, like the prospective female marital partners in this suspect PC story! you can't expect anything but lowlife degeneracy from lowlife degenerates Are you all on drugs? Why is homosexuality degenerate? I think I could probably trace same sex relationships back to the start of time, certainly back to the cradle of civilisation. Why are you so intimidated by homosexuality?
|
|
♫anna♫
Global Moderator
Aug 18 2017 - Always In Our Hearts
The Federal Reserve Act is the Betrayal of the American Revolution!
e x a l t | s m i t e
karma:
Posts: 11,769
|
Post by ♫anna♫ on Jan 17, 2010 7:28:35 GMT
you can't expect anything but lowlife degeneracy from lowlife degenerates Are you all on drugs? Why is homosexuality degenerate? I think I could probably trace same sex relationships back to the start of time, certainly back to the cradle of civilisation. Why are you so intimidated by homosexuality? Dearest June, If you had a child, who was exactly in between developping heterosexually or homosexually ( assuming that homosexuality isn't inborn ) wouldn't you nudge your child towards a heterosexual development? Wouldn't you also resent some PC agenda that's trying to draw your child into a homosexual development with fairy tale propaganda?
|
|