♫anna♫
Global Moderator
Aug 18 2017 - Always In Our Hearts
The Federal Reserve Act is the Betrayal of the American Revolution!
e x a l t | s m i t e
karma:
Posts: 11,769
|
Post by ♫anna♫ on Jun 2, 2016 23:19:20 GMT
An extremist Muslim mouths off here on this video debating with Pamela Geller and wanting her executed. Pam sure did a great job in getting these hate filled lunatics from the "Religion of Peace" to expose themselves.
GO PAM GO!! Lauren @sid iamjumbo @lindylou1 Big Lin
|
|
|
Post by kronks on Jun 3, 2016 2:43:10 GMT
Well is not she just as bad drawing hate filed cartoons?
She is as hate filled as he is.
And let's face it she started it.
Also I believe the competition was illegal under US hate speech laws.
So the real issue her is why she was not arrested for hate speech.
|
|
♫anna♫
Global Moderator
Aug 18 2017 - Always In Our Hearts
The Federal Reserve Act is the Betrayal of the American Revolution!
e x a l t | s m i t e
karma:
Posts: 11,769
|
Post by ♫anna♫ on Jun 3, 2016 3:20:33 GMT
Wow kronks ! I hope you don't have hate crime laws that get you arrested if you draw a picture. Some of the Shiite Muslims draw images of Muhammed and get persecuted by Sunnite Muslims for that.
These extremist Muslims are offended in general by the living style here. If they're so offended they should return to the nation they came from.
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Jun 3, 2016 9:01:21 GMT
Well is not she just as bad drawing hate filed cartoons? She is as hate filled as he is. And let's face it she started it. Also I believe the competition was illegal under US hate speech laws. So the real issue her is why she was not arrested for hate speech. thankfully, the u.s. is not so barbaric as to have imbecilic hate speech laws. nonetheless, only the most abjectly stupid would even consider trying to claim that anything pam geller has ever said is hate speech. the absolute FACT is that the truth is not, by definition, EVER hate speech. get a grip laddie
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Jun 3, 2016 9:03:29 GMT
Wow kronks ! I hope you don't have hate crime laws that get you arrested if you draw a picture. Some of the Shiite Muslims draw images of Muhammed and get persecuted by Sunnite Muslims for that.
These extremist Muslims are offended in general by the living style here. If they're so offended they should return to the nation they came from.
in a perfect world, garbage like this "iman" would be sent directly to hell where it belongs
|
|
♫anna♫
Global Moderator
Aug 18 2017 - Always In Our Hearts
The Federal Reserve Act is the Betrayal of the American Revolution!
e x a l t | s m i t e
karma:
Posts: 11,769
|
Post by ♫anna♫ on Jun 3, 2016 14:44:26 GMT
Wow kronks ! I hope you don't have hate crime laws that get you arrested if you draw a picture. Some of the Shiite Muslims draw images of Muhammed and get persecuted by Sunnite Muslims for that.
These extremist Muslims are offended in general by the living style here. If they're so offended they should return to the nation they came from.
in a perfect world, garbage like this "iman" would be sent directly to hell where it belongs Ridiculous how Britain bans Pamela Geller. It's better to let the extremists show their dangerous bigotry with harmless cartoon drawings contest and thus expose them. They have to let their hatred out and would strike unveiled Western world women instead if they aren't preoccupied with cartoon hysteria. They have to be expelled from the Western world.
|
|
|
Post by kronks on Jun 4, 2016 1:55:13 GMT
Wow kronks ! I hope you don't have hate crime laws that get you arrested if you draw a picture. Some of the Shiite Muslims draw images of Muhammed and get persecuted by Sunnite Muslims for that.
These extremist Muslims are offended in general by the living style here. If they're so offended they should return to the nation they came from.
Why do they feel the need to insult someone's religion? Such a law would prevent stupid people from getting themselves killed, such as the staff at the Charlie Hebdo magazine. If that is the case why did she set out to insult Muslims, she knew Muslims would find her behaviour insulting but she deliberately went out of her way to do it. She knew the event would cause trouble yet she went ahead with it. It would probably have been banned in the UK under some public order law. And how come Westboro Baptist Church protestor have been banned from US military funerals? Where is the free speech arguement there? Seems like a case of double standards to me.
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Jun 4, 2016 2:04:37 GMT
Wow kronks ! I hope you don't have hate crime laws that get you arrested if you draw a picture. Some of the Shiite Muslims draw images of Muhammed and get persecuted by Sunnite Muslims for that.
These extremist Muslims are offended in general by the living style here. If they're so offended they should return to the nation they came from.
Why do they feel the need to insult someone's religion? Such a law would prevent stupid people from getting themselves killed, such as the staff at the Charlie Hebdo magazine. Hi Kronks, I guess because they have to find something to put into their magazine. So some 'bright spark' thought that they would lampoon Muhammed which is quite alright to westernized thinking, the rest is history.
|
|
|
Post by kronks on Jun 4, 2016 2:16:36 GMT
Why do they feel the need to insult someone's religion? Such a law would prevent stupid people from getting themselves killed, such as the staff at the Charlie Hebdo magazine. Hi Kronks, I guess because they have to find something to put into their magazine. So some 'bright spark' thought that they would lampoon Muhammed which is quite alright to westernized thinking, the rest is history. Indeed, you are free to go about insulting people as much as you like, but a sensible person thinks about the likely consequences of their actions. It seems this Gellar woman is not very sensible. So it should be no surprise to her if she comes home one day to find all her spoons have been bent!
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Jun 4, 2016 2:18:20 GMT
Hi Anna, It is possible, that sometime in the future, Muslims will rise up and instigate a civil war and wipe out all the so called INFIDELS. It maybe has been on the cards since Muhammed supposedly received 'God's word'.
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Jun 4, 2016 2:36:37 GMT
Hi Kronks, In western terms it is seen as a joke, it is not meant to be taken seriously. It is obvious now that the Muslim people didn't see it that way, so took matters into their own hands to the extent that they went against the law of the land by killing. Joking is part of our social system and is usually lewd or insulting, which is why it is thought of as funny, hence a joke.
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Jun 4, 2016 11:38:35 GMT
Wow kronks ! I hope you don't have hate crime laws that get you arrested if you draw a picture. Some of the Shiite Muslims draw images of Muhammed and get persecuted by Sunnite Muslims for that.
These extremist Muslims are offended in general by the living style here. If they're so offended they should return to the nation they came from.
Why do they feel the need to insult someone's religion? Such a law would prevent stupid people from getting themselves killed, such as the staff at the Charlie Hebdo magazine. If that is the case why did she set out to insult Muslims, she knew Muslims would find her behaviour insulting but she deliberately went out of her way to do it. She knew the event would cause trouble yet she went ahead with it. It would probably have been banned in the UK under some public order law. And how come Westboro Baptist Church protestor have been banned from US military funerals? Where is the free speech arguement there? Seems like a case of double standards to me. it's apparent that you like being 180 out from reality. when did you read the entire qu'ran lad? you obviously haven't, since you have no clue as to what you're talking about. your simply parroting the stupidity and lies that you here from the pc imbeciles gives you absolutely no standing. the simple FACT is that the muz zie idiots have NO right to be offended by anything. if they want to scream about it, fine. they have NO right to be rioting or threatening to murder anyone. you never see christians acting like the barbaric muz zies. when an idiot put a crucifix in a jar of piss and called it art, you did not see any riots. you did not hear anyone talking about murdering the fool. when the muz zie idiots can act like human beings, they will be given the respect due all human beings. until they do, they will get the respect that they deserve, which is what pam gives them
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Jun 4, 2016 11:40:47 GMT
Hi Anna, It is possible, that sometime in the future, Muslims will rise up and instigate a civil war and wipe out all the so called INFIDELS. It maybe has been on the cards since Muhammed supposedly received 'God's word'. that is the goal of EVERY true muz zie. obviously, that's what kronks advocates.
|
|
♫anna♫
Global Moderator
Aug 18 2017 - Always In Our Hearts
The Federal Reserve Act is the Betrayal of the American Revolution!
e x a l t | s m i t e
karma:
Posts: 11,769
|
Post by ♫anna♫ on Jun 4, 2016 13:47:31 GMT
Wow kronks ! I hope you don't have hate crime laws that get you arrested if you draw a picture. Some of the Shiite Muslims draw images of Muhammed and get persecuted by Sunnite Muslims for that.
These extremist Muslims are offended in general by the living style here. If they're so offended they should return to the nation they came from.
Why do they feel the need to insult someone's religion? Such a law would prevent stupid people from getting themselves killed, such as the staff at the Charlie Hebdo magazine. If that is the case why did she set out to insult Muslims, she knew Muslims would find her behaviour insulting but she deliberately went out of her way to do it. She knew the event would cause trouble yet she went ahead with it. It would probably have been banned in the UK under some public order law. And how come Westboro Baptist Church protestor have been banned from US military funerals? Where is the free speech arguement there? Seems like a case of double standards to me. The fact is these extremists are ticking bombs looking for a reason to go off. Women have been raped and murdered by the fanatics with the justification that they were showing their unveiled faces and maybe wearing typical Western world summer clothing which makes them whores in the eyes of such extremists. I fully support Pamela Geller since moderate Muslims have been impotent in stopping the extremists and perhaps silently supportive. We have to act. Anyone who is offended by cartoons has no place in the Western world and must return to their nations of origin where cartoonists are subject to the death penalty.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2016 13:56:04 GMT
And here we go again .....
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Jun 4, 2016 14:23:04 GMT
Hi Anna, It is possible, that sometime in the future, Muslims will rise up and instigate a civil war and wipe out all the so called INFIDELS. It maybe has been on the cards since Muhammed supposedly received 'God's word'. that is the goal of EVERY true muz zie. obviously, that's what kronks advocates. Hi Iamjumbo, I'm not surprised!!!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2016 14:44:59 GMT
Well is not she just as bad drawing hate filed cartoons? She is as hate filled as he is. And let's face it she started it. Also I believe the competition was illegal under US hate speech laws. So the real issue her is why she was not arrested for hate speech. Kronks stated, “ . . . Well is not she just as bad drawing hate filed cartoons? . . . She is as hate filled as he is. . . . And let's face it she started it. . . . Also I believe the competition was illegal under US hate speech laws. . . . “ Kronks also included a supposed quote from somewhere as: “ . . . There are certain well-defined and limited classes of speech, the prevention and punishment of which have never been thought to raise a Constitutional problem. These include the lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous and the insulting or 'fighting' words – those which by their very utterances inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace. . . . “ And then Kronks ended with, “ . . . So the real issue her is why she was not arrested for hate speech. . . . “ Where Kronks gets these contrived interpretations of United States law is unknown except he attempts to apply Sharia Law within the Jurisdiction of the United States, and that is not legal, or historically valid. Within the United States freedom of speech is a precious and protected concept. Article I of the Bill of Rights, (in part) addresses this by excluding the federal government from enacting any law which abridges ‘Freedom of Speech.’ This includes more than just oral or written statements, and include such things as art work and donations to personally supported causes. Even so, there are situations when a person has used their freedom of speech in ways where they can be charged with a crime or sued for damages. To facilitate this possibility emanating from the Constitution of the United States (as well as the various State Constitutions) court systems, with one established for criminal law and the other for civil tort cases. For such cases to be successfully prosecuted there has to be one of two things existing. Either the speech was not true and/or that there was intent to cause harm. Neither of these things apply in the acts of Pamela Geller. However Imam Anjem Choudary is calling for the execution of Pamela Geller and in so doing using a standard of law (Sharia) not applicable within the United States. In so doing he does fit the definition of criminal hate speech which in part goes against the cultural norms of the United States and the system of law within the United States and as such can be used to charge him with (at the very least) hate speech. That Kronks doesn’t see the difference here demonstrates that he is specifically advocating for Islam and Sharia Law neither of which is legal or applicable within the United States. In so doing he is advocating against Western norms, customs and law, and therefore is advocating the ascendancy of Islamic Sharia Law over the West.
|
|
|
Post by Big Lin on Jun 4, 2016 19:46:37 GMT
that is the goal of EVERY true muz zie. obviously, that's what kronks advocates. Hi Iamjumbo, I'm not surprised!!! Look, Kronks and I disagree on almost everything. But of course it's just a LIE to claim that 'the goal of every true Muslim' is to kill the infidels. They might wish - just as Christians are supposed to wish for the Conversion of the Jews and the Second Coming - for the conversion of the rest of the world but they do NOT believe that the only way to do that is through murder. Most of what the so-called 'radical Muslim/IS etc mob' claim to be Islam is specifically FORBIDDEN by the Quran. They are NOT Muslims; they are Satanists PRETENDING to be Muslims because their whole intention is to DESTROY Islam. And by the way 94% of terrorism in the world is NON-MUSLIM. So why obsess with the 6% carried out by people pretending to be Muslim? ] The only logical answer is bigotry.
|
|
|
Post by Big Lin on Jun 4, 2016 19:48:52 GMT
Well is not she just as bad drawing hate filed cartoons? She is as hate filled as he is. And let's face it she started it. Also I believe the competition was illegal under US hate speech laws. So the real issue her is why she was not arrested for hate speech. thankfully, the u.s. is not so barbaric as to have imbecilic hate speech laws. nonetheless, only the most abjectly stupid would even consider trying to claim that anything pam geller has ever said is hate speech. the absolute FACT is that the truth is not, by definition, EVER hate speech. get a grip laddie And the absolute FACTS are that an opinion is not, by definition, a FACT and that a lie is never, by definition, ever the truth.
|
|
♫anna♫
Global Moderator
Aug 18 2017 - Always In Our Hearts
The Federal Reserve Act is the Betrayal of the American Revolution!
e x a l t | s m i t e
karma:
Posts: 11,769
|
Post by ♫anna♫ on Jun 4, 2016 21:00:05 GMT
Hi Anna, It is possible, that sometime in the future, Muslims will rise up and instigate a civil war and wipe out all the so called INFIDELS. It maybe has been on the cards since Muhammed supposedly received 'God's word'. I like to think that Muhammed or whoever wrote the Koran understood the passages referring to killing infidels as simply being ugly wartime diatribe and only referring to armed enemy combattants in the context of war. We will never know.
I do believe that certain high finance instigators intentionally enabled ISIS to rise to power by destroying the governments which contained these fanatics. The plan IMO is to eventually have a major war with ISIS controlled nations and install marionette governments after the defeat of ISIS furthering the one world government agenda.
|
|