|
Post by captain on Feb 27, 2012 3:14:45 GMT
It is an insult and what I believe or don't plays little issue with your behavior. I'm talking about the ability to discuss something without resorting to the childhood playground tactics. If you are so smart, above the idiots you condemn, you could offer a counter view that may disprove the conspiracy claim. Yet we do not see that from you. Why do you think that is? first of all, there is NO reason or need to. if you want to be crazy enough to espouse such idiocy, it is TOTALLY up to YOU to conclusively prove it, beyond ALL doubt. the onus is entirely on you. the intelligent people who know better don't have to prove shyt I agree the person who makes the claim needs to provide the proof. At least in theory. I typically just ask questions. Those questions should never allow you to jump to conclusions on what I might believe. Questions are meant to discover what you believe and to seek knowledge to what a logical mind can not explain.
|
|
♫anna♫
Global Moderator
Aug 18 2017 - Always In Our Hearts
The Federal Reserve Act is the Betrayal of the American Revolution!
e x a l t | s m i t e
karma:
Posts: 11,769
|
Post by ♫anna♫ on Feb 27, 2012 8:09:52 GMT
The collapse of the 47 story tall Building 7, which wasn't hit by a plane, near the WTC towers has raised a lot of suspicion too!
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Feb 27, 2012 14:20:45 GMT
that would be a far more intelligent theory than any of the 9/11 idiocies Sorry, but there would be nothing intelligent about such theory were someone to hatch it. In fact, it would be complete lunacy. something like the moronic 9/11 conspiracy trips, except eminently more plausible
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Feb 27, 2012 14:24:07 GMT
first of all, there is NO reason or need to. if you want to be crazy enough to espouse such idiocy, it is TOTALLY up to YOU to conclusively prove it, beyond ALL doubt. the onus is entirely on you. the intelligent people who know better don't have to prove shyt I agree the person who makes the claim needs to provide the proof. At least in theory. I typically just ask questions. Those questions should never allow you to jump to conclusions on what I might believe. Questions are meant to discover what you believe and to seek knowledge to what a logical mind can not explain. that's true enough. however, questions should be asked that are going to lead to knowledge. since all such questions about 9/11 are prima facie preposterous, they don't lead to anything other than making the questioner look like a fool on top of that, such questions have been asked for ten years, and NO ONE has been able to muster the slightest shred of anything even remotely resembling proof for them. as i said, could have, may have etc NEVER, under ANY circumstance, demonstrate anything whatsoever. in order for your argument to have ANY merit whatsoever, it has to be conclusively proven, beyond ALL doubt
|
|
|
Post by captain on Feb 27, 2012 15:04:26 GMT
I agree the person who makes the claim needs to provide the proof. At least in theory. I typically just ask questions. Those questions should never allow you to jump to conclusions on what I might believe. Questions are meant to discover what you believe and to seek knowledge to what a logical mind can not explain. that's true enough. however, questions should be asked that are going to lead to knowledge. since all such questions about 9/11 are prima facie preposterous, they don't lead to anything other than making the questioner look like a fool on top of that, such questions have been asked for ten years, and NO ONE has been able to muster the slightest shred of anything even remotely resembling proof for them. as i said, could have, may have etc NEVER, under ANY circumstance, demonstrate anything whatsoever. in order for your argument to have ANY merit whatsoever, it has to be conclusively proven, beyond ALL doubt Well of course no one can provide proof. That's not by definition the meaning of conspiracy. If the 9/11 conspiracy carried merit, you would be asking one person to prove what an entire government is denying/hiding. Even in the simplest of civil suits both sides are entitled to all the facts. We don't have that here do we? I think it good to ask questions and only problematic to question the questioner without joining in on the search.
|
|
♫anna♫
Global Moderator
Aug 18 2017 - Always In Our Hearts
The Federal Reserve Act is the Betrayal of the American Revolution!
e x a l t | s m i t e
karma:
Posts: 11,769
|
Post by ♫anna♫ on Sept 11, 2015 4:49:21 GMT
There is an effort to get classified information about the 911 attack released. The information reveals the identities of those who aided the 911 attackers and were never held accountable.
|
|
|
♫anna♫
Global Moderator
Aug 18 2017 - Always In Our Hearts
The Federal Reserve Act is the Betrayal of the American Revolution!
e x a l t | s m i t e
karma:
Posts: 11,769
|
Post by ♫anna♫ on Feb 7, 2017 13:15:08 GMT
QUOTE: A 1968 advert with an artist’s rendition of a plane hitting the WTC. April, 1967 / Newsweek Magazine (Just before construction on the towers began) Front cover: David Rockefeller, who pushed for the towers to be built, wearing a watch with hands on the "9" and the "11" Back cover: Cigarette ad depicts towers and speaks of "a fight worth fighting"QUOTE: 1968 / Newspaper Ad A group of New York Real Estate developers publishes a full-page ad in the New York Times, "warning" that the new buildings (yet to be built) will be so tall that a commercial airliner might crash into them. UNQUOTE: tinyurl.com/zl3o759
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Feb 11, 2017 0:52:48 GMT
QUOTE: A 1968 advert with an artist’s rendition of a plane hitting the WTC. April, 1967 / Newsweek Magazine (Just before construction on the towers began) Front cover: David Rockefeller, who pushed for the towers to be built, wearing a watch with hands on the "9" and the "11" Back cover: Cigarette ad depicts towers and speaks of "a fight worth fighting"[url href="http://s1070./user/trishadru/media/p olitics/3298621_zpsggh9nx5g.jpg.html"][img src="http://i1070./albums/u489/trishadru/p olitics/3298621_zpsggh9nx5g.jpg"] [/url] QUOTE: 1968 / Newspaper Ad A group of New York Real Estate developers publishes a full-page ad in the New York Times, "warning" that the new buildings (yet to be built) will be so tall that a commercial airliner might crash into them. UNQUOTE: tinyurl.com/zl3o759[/quote][brHi Anna, I was just going to say that that could always be a possibility of happening. If that picture was made public before the terrorists struck the Towers, then maybe that is what gave them the idea. I wouldn't want to have to live with that thought for the rest of my life. How awful.!!!
|
|
♫anna♫
Global Moderator
Aug 18 2017 - Always In Our Hearts
The Federal Reserve Act is the Betrayal of the American Revolution!
e x a l t | s m i t e
karma:
Posts: 11,769
|
Post by ♫anna♫ on Feb 11, 2017 5:22:54 GMT
Hi Scottish Lassie ! Baraka bashad! This "delivery truck" was seen at numerous places before the 911 attack. It was driven by apparently non English speaking Mideasterners. I still haven't gotten the full story on this.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2017 15:04:26 GMT
QUOTE: A 1968 advert with an artist’s rendition of a plane hitting the WTC. April, 1967 / Newsweek Magazine (Just before construction on the towers began) Front cover: David Rockefeller, who pushed for the towers to be built, wearing a watch with hands on the "9" and the "11" Back cover: Cigarette ad depicts towers and speaks of "a fight worth fighting"QUOTE: 1968 / Newspaper Ad A group of New York Real Estate developers publishes a full-page ad in the New York Times, "warning" that the new buildings (yet to be built) will be so tall that a commercial airliner might crash into them. UNQUOTE: tinyurl.com/zl3o759It's nothing weird with any tall building it's a foreseeable possibility
|
|
|
Post by mikemarshall on Feb 14, 2017 20:50:24 GMT
Here is a new conspiracy theory fcr those who enjoy this kind of science fiction.
Bin Laden and Al-Qaida members carried out 9/11.
What a shocking idea!
|
|