|
Post by jean on Jan 18, 2010 22:47:32 GMT
...no male homos are monogamous... Why do they want to get married, then?
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Jan 18, 2010 22:59:43 GMT
I don't have any real problem with this story about the 2 male penguins, who had a closeness between them and mutual parential desires. I just really don't think it's fair to describe these penguins as homosexuals. A strong bond between a brother and a sister shouldn't be described as a heterosexual relationship either. that really is stupid. i've seen this idiocy a dozen times, and i have yet to see any proof of the two males penguins actively engaging in homosexual sex, and that is the ONLY thing that would make them homosexual penguins. it's just another example of the abject stupidity of those pushing the gay agenda
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Jan 18, 2010 23:18:33 GMT
it is nothing but pc bs. no one, or very few anyway, disrespects anyones choice as long as that individual doesn't try to pass a degenerate choice off as normal, and parade it around in public if f.gs were decent, there would be no such thing as a gay pride parade. you don't see normal people out having a heterosexual parade Normal to you will be very different to me. Normal to now will be very different to pre Christian times. Normal is not normal ;D well, it's not constant anyway. I don't find homosexuality degenerate or abnormal - and gay pride parades are fab. Have you ever heard of Mardi Gras Jim? Or the English Winter Carnivals? I thought you Americans loves a parade - all that baton twirling etc i DO like a legitimate parade. i never miss the rose parade, and try to always watch the macy's thanksgiving day parade. i like big balloons. mardi gras is a blast. that's the only place you can see thousands of boobs in public. since there is NOTHING to be proud of in the fact that a male likes to suck on another male's dyck, there is certainly NOTHING legitimate about a gay pride parade. once again, if they wanted to have a parade down mission street in san francisco, or pershing square and los feliz in los angeles, etc, they would be entitled to. it is when they are displaying their degeneracy in front of small children in the normal people's part of town that they are not entitled to
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Jan 18, 2010 23:21:50 GMT
when they prance around in public, they harm EVERYONE Er, how exactly? What possible difference does it make to anyone else if two gays walk down the street arm in arm? it was STRICTLY homo males who spread aids, and caused it to enter the normal people population Absolute garbage! Typical bigotry from the redneck brigade. i realize that you are lacking any kind of grasp on reality, but, what the hell. since you choose to ignore FACT, suppose you tell us how you think that aids was spread., and why there was such a massive campaign directed SOLELY toward gays to try and stop the spread. while you are blathering, don't forget to tell us why you think that a hundred times as many gays have died from aids as heterosexuals
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Jan 18, 2010 23:26:17 GMT
...no male homos are monogamous... Why do they want to get married, then?occasssionally, some do decide that, after they've had a different dyck stuffing their bum every night for thirty years, they found the one they like the best
|
|
|
Post by firedancer on Jan 19, 2010 0:01:51 GMT
I'm not sure that anyone who has had 200 sexual partners in their lifetime should be moralising about anyone else's sexual behaviour or about sexually transmitted diseases.
That's an awfully neat number by the way Iamjumbo or did you just get bored counting after 190 or so and round it up? ;D
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Jan 19, 2010 12:59:11 GMT
I'm not sure that anyone who has had 200 sexual partners in their lifetime should be moralising about anyone else's sexual behaviour or about sexually transmitted diseases. That's an awfully neat number by the way Iamjumbo or did you just get bored counting after 190 or so and round it up? ;D if i actually think about it, i can remember 118 names. really, that is not that many. i am sixty-two, and have been in two steady relationships for nineteen of the last 21 years. before that, i i was fairly promiscuous and only had two relationships that lasted two years. taking that time away, and figuring that my first was at fifteen, that is only an average of six a year. however, it is nowhere close to a super number. i can't recall the chaps name offhand, but one of the lads that was married to bridget bardot had had two thousand. THAT is far too many. nonetheless, it is irrelevant. all those that i slept with had the proper equipment. there is also the little point that, my ol' lady has a problem with asking how i can tell her when i did so much worse than she has. as i have explained to her, too many times, that is EXACTLY the reason why i CAN tell her
|
|
|
Post by firedancer on Jan 19, 2010 14:39:42 GMT
I don't mind how many partners you had Iamjumbo - I still think that with 'only' 118 (give or take) you are on dodgy ground moralising about other people's sexual behaviour or sexual diseases - "proper equipment" or not. On another thread you were talking about absolute rights and wrongs for all time. Where does fornication fit into your idea of absolute right and wrong? Certainly the Bible wasn't too keen on it... Not sure that 62 is relevant: I only say that as I am older than you and have always felt quality beats quantity every time
|
|
♫anna♫
Global Moderator
Aug 18 2017 - Always In Our Hearts
The Federal Reserve Act is the Betrayal of the American Revolution!
e x a l t | s m i t e
karma:
Posts: 11,769
|
Post by ♫anna♫ on Jan 19, 2010 15:23:01 GMT
I don't have any real problem with this story about the 2 male penguins, who had a closeness between them and mutual parential desires. I just really don't think it's fair to describe these penguins as homosexuals. A strong bond between a brother and a sister shouldn't be described as a heterosexual relationship either. that really is stupid. i've seen this idiocy a dozen times, and i have yet to see any proof of the two males penguins actively engaging in homosexual sex, and that is the ONLY thing that would make them homosexual penguins. it's just another example of the abject stupidity of those pushing the gay agenda I agree! We have a lot of suspect, and deceitfully concocted PC expressions, like "platonic homosexuality". If the relationship is non-sexual never was and never will be associated with sexual practices then it is inappropriate to define the relationship as sexual, heterosexual or homosexual! In fairness to the book about the 2 male penguins there is no reference to homosexuality. Only these dumbed down PC teachers try to tell their students that the penguins are homosexuals! I would have no problem reading that penguin book to a child and warning him/her that the PC popes try to misuse this book to promote homosexuality. In reality it's about 2 male penguin friends, who raise a child together. It's SLANDER to call 2 males, who raise a child together homosexuals, if they don't practice the sexual acts! This YouTube video reports on homosexual fairy tales in British schools!
English children in Sutherland are being forced to read the "King & King", which i feel is absolutely inappropriate at best. The story about the penguins would be OK, if teachers didn't try to distort and misinterpret it.
|
|
|
Post by riotgrrl on Jan 19, 2010 15:26:16 GMT
Anna, can I just clarify your postion:
1 - You don't want your children being taught about homosexuality. 2 - You would be happy to read them the penguin book, BUT 3 - With the caveat that, while you were reading it to them, you would emphasise that it had nothing to do with homosexuality.
Or have I misunderstood . . .
Also, you keep talking about teaching homosexuality in schools, and, unless your American schools are very different from ours, I really can't imagine that happening.
I think that what you want to happen is for teachers to pretend that homosexuality does not exist and, should it rear its ugly head, to teach the children that it is WRONG. No teacher is going to do that. Teachers know that to educate children they have to be honest.
|
|
♫anna♫
Global Moderator
Aug 18 2017 - Always In Our Hearts
The Federal Reserve Act is the Betrayal of the American Revolution!
e x a l t | s m i t e
karma:
Posts: 11,769
|
Post by ♫anna♫ on Jan 19, 2010 16:03:30 GMT
Anna, can I just clarify your postion: 1 - You don't want your children being taught about homosexuality. I object in particular to the propaganda homosexual fairy tales that mock heterosexually, as seen with the portrayal of the princesses in "King & King". Why not warn students that certain brutal male homosexual practices in particular are spreading the aids epidemic?? Why present a homosexual fairy tale, which portrays homosexuality as the desirable and preferred choice?2 - You would be happy to read them the penguin book, BUT 3 - With the caveat that, while you were reading it to them, you would emphasise that it had nothing to do with homosexuality. Or have I misunderstood . . . . I wouldn't say this penguin book is a must for children, but if it's properly understood then one sees it's wrong to compare these penguins with human male homosexuals.The penguin story is about brotherly love and raising an abandoned penguin child and not male homosexuality!Also, you keep talking about teaching homosexuality in schools, and, unless your American schools are very different from ours, I really can't imagine that happening. I think that what you want to happen is for teachers to pretend that homosexuality does not exist and, should it rear its ugly head, to teach the children that it is WRONG. No teacher is going to do that. Teachers know that to educate children they have to be honest. Only in US states where same sex marriage is legal are these homosexual fairy tales part of school curriculum for children, under the age of 10. I don't have problems with a factual presentation of homosexuality and of course children should be allowed to live their childhood out and not be bombarded with adult sexual matters. Sex education should come much later and i prefer the parents playing the main role in this.
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Jan 19, 2010 16:16:58 GMT
I don't mind how many partners you had Iamjumbo - I still think that with 'only' 118 (give or take) you are on dodgy ground moralising about other people's sexual behaviour or sexual diseases - "proper equipment" or not. On another thread you were talking about absolute rights and wrongs for all time. Where does fornication fit into your idea of absolute right and wrong? Certainly the Bible wasn't too keen on it... Not sure that 62 is relevant: I only say that as I am older than you and have always felt quality beats quantity every time i was only putting the number in perspective. as i said, most people, especially guys, average more than six a year. you are quite correct that the bible isn't keen on cohabitation without marriage. i have never been married, but i've cohabitated a host of times. i have never claimed that it is right. anyway, since i am so close to perfect in every other way, i'm entitled to one fault
|
|
|
Post by iamjumbo on Jan 19, 2010 16:21:05 GMT
Anna, can I just clarify your postion: 1 - You don't want your children being taught about homosexuality. 2 - You would be happy to read them the penguin book, BUT 3 - With the caveat that, while you were reading it to them, you would emphasise that it had nothing to do with homosexuality. Or have I misunderstood . . . Also, you keep talking about teaching homosexuality in schools, and, unless your American schools are very different from ours, I really can't imagine that happening. I think that what you want to happen is for teachers to pretend that homosexuality does not exist and, should it rear its ugly head, to teach the children that it is WRONG. No teacher is going to do that. Teachers know that to educate children they have to be honest. Teachers know that to educate children they have to be honest that is EXACTLY what we want teachers to do, and that at which they are failing so miserably.
|
|
|
Post by riotgrrl on Jan 19, 2010 16:23:19 GMT
Anna, can I just clarify your postion: 1 - You don't want your children being taught about homosexuality. 2 - You would be happy to read them the penguin book, BUT 3 - With the caveat that, while you were reading it to them, you would emphasise that it had nothing to do with homosexuality. Or have I misunderstood . . . Also, you keep talking about teaching homosexuality in schools, and, unless your American schools are very different from ours, I really can't imagine that happening. I think that what you want to happen is for teachers to pretend that homosexuality does not exist and, should it rear its ugly head, to teach the children that it is WRONG. No teacher is going to do that. Teachers know that to educate children they have to be honest. Teachers know that to educate children they have to be honest that is EXACTLY what we want teachers to do, and that at which they are failing so miserably. I'm really sorry that your teachers in the USA are failing miserably, but that's not a problem particularly here in the UK. We have some excellent teachers, and some not so good ones, but thankfully, unlike the poor old USA, our teachers aren't on the whole 'failing miserably'. Or did you mean that by allowing children to know that homosexuality exists they are de facto 'failing miserably'?
|
|
|
Post by riotgrrl on Jan 19, 2010 16:27:43 GMT
Anna
I have no idea if these kind of fairy stories are harmful to children or not, but if they are, I would certainly be equally suspicious of 'heterosexual' fairytales, as I've already said, and the effect they may have on young girls.
Something like 'Snow White' is almost grooming them . . .
|
|
|
Post by firedancer on Jan 19, 2010 16:48:31 GMT
Um, think that would be 118 (give or take) faults Iamjumbo And I think that to say the Bible isn't keen on cohabitation without marriage (or fornication if you don't want to fudge the issue) is an understatement. Anyone would think you were British making an understatement like that ;D Seems like you believe that one homosexual act is worse than 118 acts of fornication....yes?
|
|
|
Post by trubble on Jan 19, 2010 17:02:24 GMT
Sleeping Beauty is promoting Necrophilia.
|
|
|
Post by trubble on Jan 19, 2010 17:03:34 GMT
Cinderella promotes Foot-Fetishism. There's a lot more of that about than you think.
|
|
|
Post by trubble on Jan 19, 2010 17:04:52 GMT
Rapunzel is just plain filth with all that phallic imagery and the growing of hair is clearly about puberty. The more I think of it, all fairytales should be banned from schools.
|
|
|
Post by trubble on Jan 19, 2010 17:06:25 GMT
I'll eat my hat if Jack and the Beanstalk isn't a cynical advertising campaign for Viagra.
|
|